RAISING THE STAKES

By Naomi E. Feldman, Jacob Goldin, Tatiana A. Homonoff. National tax journal, 2018

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Recent evidence suggests consumers fail to account for taxes that are excluded from a good’s displayed price. What is less understood is whether and how such “salience effects” depend on the magnitude of the tax. We conduct a laboratory shopping experiment with real stakes to study the effect of tax size on salience. We find no evidence that salience effects decline as the tax rate increases; we document a statistically significant salience effect at a tax rate that is considerably larger than the tax rates at which such effects have been previously documented. In fact, our results are more consistent with the hypothesis that higher taxes make consumers less attentive (at least for the range of taxes we consider). This result can be explained by a confirmation bias theory of salience: consumers tend to disregard information (like a tax) that does not align with their intention to purchase an item, and this lack of alignment increases in the size of the tax.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d5ca1c46e7d835dcfea4b81fcef347c51c70d81

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. Maria J. Anderson-Coto
  2. Constance Steinkuehler
  3. Je Seok Lee
  4. Jason G. Reitman
  5. Minerva Wu
  6. James Paul Gee

Citations in the corpus