Is Context-Aware Computing Taking Control away from the User? Three Levels of Interactivity Examined

By Louise Barkhuus, Anind K. Dey. Ubiquitous Computing, 2003

390 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Context Aware Computing for The Internet of Things: A Survey (2013, background): “Context awareness can be identified in three levels based on the user interaction [104].”
Toolkit to support intelligibility in context-aware applications (2010, background): “This can frustrate users [4], and cause them to lose trust in the applications [29].”
Is It Worth the Hassle? Exploring the Added Value of Evaluating the Usability of Context-Aware Mobile Systems in the Field (2004, methodology): “71 tion was in-situ and closely related to the context, they would still get confused of the system being actively context-aware (as defined by Barkhuus and Dey [3]).”
Assessing demand for intelligibility in context-aware applications (2009, background): “, [5, 6, 10]), our participants were interested in knowing how to control applications.”
Principles of Smart Home Control (2006, background): “While end-user programming returns some measure of control to the user over preprogrammed or learning-only systems [1][21], ultimately, framing the problem as end-user programming leads researchers to view the research and evaluation in terms”