Pleasure in the mind: Restrained eating and spontaneous hedonic thoughts about food.

By E. Papies, Wolfgang Stroebe, Henk Aarts. 2007

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Nutrition and Dietetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d24fa287e75dfe568a5cc8a3380cd212c3b1ad9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Henk Aarts
2. Wolfgang Stroebe
3. Wilhelm Hofmann
4. Kentaro Fujita
5. Malte Friese
6. G. V. Koningsbruggen
7. Reinout W. Wiers
8. E. Papies

In Clinical Psychology

1. Wolfgang Stroebe
2. Henk Aarts
3. G. V. Koningsbruggen
4. E. Papies
5. Kentaro Fujita
6. Henk Schut
7. Wilhelm Hofmann
8. Malte Friese

In Nutrition and Dietetics

1. Henk Aarts
2. Wolfgang Stroebe
3. Kentaro Fujita
4. E. Papies

Citations in the corpus

• The allure of forbidden food: On the role of attention in self-regulation (2008, methodology): “Experimental tests of the processes proposed by this goal conflict model confirmed the idea that restrained eaters react to palatable food cues with hedonic thoughts about food (Papies et al., 2007).”
• Through the eyes of dieters: Biased size perception of food following tempting food primes (2011, background): “Because for dieters, tempting food cues activate the eating enjoyment goal (Hofmann et al., in press; Papies et al., 2007), palatable food should be highly functional in the service of their goal pursuit (cf.”
• Impulsive versus reflective influences on health behavior: a theoretical framework and empirical review (2008, background): “To the extent that “hot” thoughts (Metcalfe & Mischel, 1999 ) about the pleasurable aspects of palatable food are triggered by external or imagined stimulus exposure, the enjoyment goal may become dominant and inhibit the eating control goal (eg, Papies, Stroebe, & Aarts, 2007 ; Shah, Friedman, & ”
• On Conceptualizing Self-Control as More Than the Effortful Inhibition of Impulses (2011, background): “Although temptation cues generally elicit spontaneously positive evaluations of indulging in those temptations (e.g., Papies et al., 2007; Sayette & Hufford, 1997; Sherman et al., 2003), Fishbach and colleagues have suggested that people can counter these impulses by activating more negative…”
• Why dieters fail : Testing the goal conflict model of eating (2017, background): “We already discussed evidence that restrained eaters are more likely to react with anticipatory eating enjoyment to cues signaling palatable food (Papies et al., 2007) and that priming eating enjoyment results in overeating in restrained but not unrestrained eaters (Fedoroff et al.”