Strategic Technology Choice and Capacity Investment Under Demand Uncertainty

By Manu Goyal, Serguei Netessine. Management Sciences, 2007

311 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Value of Fast Fashion: Quick Response, Enhanced Design, and Strategic Consumer Behavior (2011, background): “Postponement—the practice of delaying final assembly—also seeks to provide higher product availability with a lower inventory investment; see Lee and Tang (1997), Feitzinger and Lee (1997), Goyal and Netessine (2007), and Anand and Girotra (2007).”
Strategic Capacity Investment Under Uncertainty (2015, methodology): “This is because, according to, e.g., Goyal and Netessine (2007), ﬁrms may ﬁnd it diﬃcult to produce below capacity due to ﬁxed costs associated with, for example, labor, commitments to suppliers, and production ramp-up.”
Technology Choice and Capacity Portfolios under Emissions Regulation (2016, unknown): “They assume: (i) 100% utilization of capacity (i.e., Goyal and Netessine 2007); (ii) a monop-olistic ﬁrm (i.e., Bish and Wang 2004, Boyabatli and Toktay 2011, Goyal and Netessine 2011) in which case 100% utilization results; or (iii) a ﬁxed and exogenous market price (e.g., Fine and Freund 1990,…”