Two traditions of happiness research, not two distinct types of happiness
By R. Biswas-Diener, T. Kashdan, L. King. 2009
220 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2cc99f75ad94b2140afe6dbfa446f78fe49c1273
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Michael I. Norton
- Elizabeth W. Dunn
- L. Aknin
- Jason R. Raibley
- Gillian M. Sandstrom
- Adam M. Grant
- Sonja Lyubomirsky
- Alex Imas
In Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
In Social Psychology
- Michael I. Norton
- Elizabeth W. Dunn
- L. Aknin
- Jason R. Raibley
- Gillian M. Sandstrom
- Tom Lane
- Sonja Lyubomirsky
- Cassie Mogilner
Citations in the corpus
- Happiness is not Well-Being (2012, background): “First, some psychologists criticize eudaimonic models on account of the lack of convergence among contemporary eudaimonic theorists (Biswas-Diener et al. 2009).”
- Does social connection turn good deeds into good feelings?: On the value of putting the ‘social’ in prosocial spending (2013, methodology): “, 2012) and helpful for assessing the full conceptualization of subjective well-being (Biswas-Diener et al., 2009; Diener and Biswas-Diener, 2002; Kashdan et al., 2008), which cannot be captured in one single scale (Diener, 1984).”
- Positive mood and social relatedness as information about meaning in life (2009, unknown): “f, Biswas-Diener, Kashdan, & King, 2009 ; Kashdan, Biswas-Diener, & King, 2008 ), the potential role of positive feelings in the experience of meaning in life has long been recognized (Aristotle, 350 BCE/1998 CE; James, 1900 ; Klinger, 1977 ; Yalom, 1980 ).”