Odor–Genes Covariance and Genetic Relatedness Assessments: Rethinking Odor-Based “Recognition” Mechanisms in Rodents
By J. Todrank, G. Heth. 2003
88 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Sensory Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2cc5f29d9445260fe2add4d42bc14dee4909a948
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Sensory Systems
Citations in the corpus
- Kin recognition via cuticular hydrocarbons shapes cockroach social life (2009, background): “…framework, elaborated mainly from interpretations of recent empirical evidence in verte- brates, considers only the mechanisms allowing relatedness assessment sensu stricto, irrespective of spatial location and familiarity (Barnard 1990; Grafen 1990; Tang-Martinez 2001; Todrank and Heth 2003).”
- Kin recognition: an overview of conceptual issues, mechanisms and evolutionary theory (2010, background): “For example, Todrank and Heth (2003) suggest that animals produce odour signals (which are usually a blend of compounds or ‘signature mixtures’ sensu Wyatt 2004) that have a wide range of functions, from individual to kin to species recognition.”
- Message ‘scent’: lemurs detect the genetic relatedness and quality of conspecifics via olfactory cues (2010, background): “All rights reserved. between potential mates (reviewed in: Penn 2002; Todrank & Heth 2003; Johnston 2008) or about estimates of genetic quality (Willse et al. 2006; Johansson & Jones 2007; Thom et al. 2008), information that is readily used by prospectivemates (Wedekind et al.1995; Penn & Potts…”