The Local Group and Other Neighboring Galaxy Groups

By I. Karachentsev. 2005

198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c7edf2ecc41c86d107de64b094c0611c3abeea9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. I. Karachentsev
2. R. B. Tully
3. James S. Bullock
4. P. Hopkins
5. Dmitry I. Makarov
6. C. Conroy
7. M. Boylan-Kolchin
8. Edward Shaya

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. Dmitry I. Makarov
2. R. B. Tully
3. I. Karachentsev
4. Edward Shaya
5. L. Rizzi
6. L. Makarova
7. M. Sharina
8. A. Dolphin

In Instrumentation

1. R. B. Tully
2. I. Karachentsev
3. Dmitry I. Makarov
4. James S. Bullock
5. Edward Shaya
6. M. Boylan-Kolchin
7. L. Rizzi
8. C. Conroy

Citations in the corpus

• UPDATED NEARBY GALAXY CATALOG (2013, background): “The achieved distance accuracy allows to determine the total mass of nearby groups with a relative error of ∼ 30% by the value of radius of the “zero-velocity sphere” R0, which separates the group volume from remaining expanding neighborhood (Karachentsev et al. 2009, Karachentsev 2005).”
• Associations of Dwarf Galaxies (2006, methodology): “Still, M/L values are an order of magnitude larger than values attributed to nearby spiral rich groups (Karachentsev 2005).”
• THE ACS NEARBY GALAXY SURVEY TREASURY (2007, methodology): “Distances for NGC 247, NGC 55, DDO 187, UGC 8833, HS117, and KKH37 were also revised according to new distances in Karachentsev (2005).”
• ELVIS: Exploring the Local Volume in Simulations (2013, background): “The velocity field within the Local Volume contains a wealth of information on the assembly history and mass of the Local Group (Kahn & Woltjer 1959; Karachentsev et al. 2002; Karachentsev 2005; Peirani & de Freitas Pacheco 2006; Teyssier et al. 2012; van der Marel et al. 2012).”
• The Hubble Flow around the Centaurus A/M83 Galaxy Complex (2006, unknown): “The observations of the nearest groups have been reviewed by Karachentsev (2005).”
• The Hubble Constant: A Summary of the Hubble Space Telescope Program for the Luminosity Calibration of Type Ia Supernovae by Means of Cepheids (2006, background): “It may appear puzzling that Karachentsev (2005) derivedH0 ¼ 72 from six very nearby groups with distances from the TRGB and other distance indicators, and H0 ¼ 68 (Karachentsev et al. 2006) from 110 field galaxies with distances 2:5 MpcP rP 7 Mpc based on TRGB and old Cepheid distances.”
• Galaxy groups and clouds in the local (z∼ 0.01) Universe (2010, background): “Karachentsev (2005) lists the members of several nearby groups like Cen A and M 81.”
• The Detailed Star Formation History in the Spheroid, Outer Disk, and Tidal Stream of the Andromeda Galaxy (2006, background): “The nearest galaxy groups to our own lie beyond 3 Mpc, with the closest (the Maffei Group) being heavily reddened (Karachentsev 2005).”
• Advanced Camera for Surveys Imaging of 25 Galaxies in Nearby Groups and in the Field (2005, methodology): “According to Karachentsev (2005), the mean square virial velocity of galaxies along the line of sight in nine nearby groups ranges from 54 km s 1 (IC 342 group, Sculptor filament) to 105 km s 1 (Cen A group), with a median of v ¼ 71 km s 1.”