Academic capitalism and the new economy : markets, state, and higher education
By Sheila Slaughter, Gary Rhoades. 2009
1,209 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c6f49023bcb48d4be25010470b4f779c05d6f25
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- P. Benneworth
- Rómulo Pinheiro
- Steven P. Vallas
- James Karlsen
- Daniel Lee Kleinman
- Martin Kenney
- Ben R. Martin
- Mario Biagioli
Citations in the corpus
- Will the real smart city please stand up? (2008, background): “like the virtual Digital City of Amsterdam, also see Ishido, 2002 on ‘digital Kyoto’), and knowledge-based cities frequently focus on the relation of universities and academic knowledge and their links to the business world (Slaughter and Rhoades, 2004; Deem, 2001), relations which don’t only depend”
- The Past, Present, and Future of the Research University (2011, unknown): “Conflict between the traditional academic goals of the university and the desire to earn income from research, often from corporate enterprises, has created conflicts of interest and occasionally inappropriate relationships (Slaughter and Rhoades 2004 ).”
- In search of the profit-maximizing actor: motivations and definitions of success from nascent academic entrepreneurs (2011, background): “Furthermore, the traditional mission of the university is teaching, basic research, and knowledge dissemination; thus, there are many structural and cultural barriers within to inhibit technology commercialization (Bercovitz and Feldman 2008; Chiesa and Piccaluga 2000; Kenney and Goe 2003; Markman e”
- Strategic agency and institutional change: investigating the role of universities in regional innovation systems (RISs) (2017, background): “To link with RODRIGUEZ POSE’S (2013) idea of ‘institutional failures’, we frame leadership as one specific type of institutional entrepreneurship creating new (semi-)collective institutions, in part by reshaping institutions’ own internal activities (cf.”
- Academic misconduct, misrepresentation and gaming: A reassessment (2019, background): “Increasing pressure from granting agencies and the emphasis many universities place on undertaking commercially valuable research have created incentives for re-orienting one’s research agenda, and for ‘spinning’ research results in ways favorable to the research sponsor’s interest (Sismondo, 2008) ”