A comparison of measures of disproportionality for signal detection in spontaneous reporting systems for adverse drug reactions

By E. V. van Puijenbroek, Andrew Bate, H. Leufkens, M. Lindquist, R. Orre, A. Egberts. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2002

1,252 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Pharmacology, Statistics and Probability, Toxicology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c65e74142ac0fe999212ec1d60346520a6a9190

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistics and Probability

1. S. Lanes
2. S. Sacks
3. Kenneth J. Rothman
4. Peter C. Austin

In Toxicology

1. S. Lanes
2. S. Sacks
3. Kenneth J. Rothman

Citations in the corpus

• The reporting odds ratio and its advantages over the proportional reporting ratio (2004, background): “Van Puijenbrock et al.3 compared the PRR and the ROR for use in signal detection from spontaneous report data, but without selectivity of control events in calculating the ROR.”