A simplified elliptic model of rough surface contact
By J. Greenwood. 2006
224 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c5cd05952c73dc1a7635508f50a0dd7fbbc5203
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Mechanical Engineering
In Mechanics of Materials
Citations in the corpus
- From infinitesimal to full contact between rough surfaces: Evolution of the contact area (2014, methodology): “For more realistic separations/pressures, asperity based models [Greenwood, 2006, Carbone and Bottiglione, 2008] predict that the evolution of the contact area is strongly dependent on Nayak’s parameter: the higher it is, the smaller the contact area for a given pressure and hence the more it…”
- Statistical model of nearly complete elastic rough surface contact (2014, methodology): “(13), we have the semi-minor axis of the elliptic non-contact region defined in coordinates ðx0; y0Þ bi ¼ ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 3ðp pÞ 2j1 s ; ð14Þ which is derived by Manners and Greenwood (2006).”
- Modeling and simulation in tribology across scales: An overview (2018, unknown): “These methods, while offering a signi fi cant step forward in analytical capabilities, do not provide the same accuracy as the Muller and Greenwood analyses, which are therefore usually selected as the starting point for the development of newer deterministic formulations.”
- A Review of Elastic–Plastic Contact Mechanics (2017, methodology): “However, refinements to the model have been proposed, and it is still considered a very useful model [202,243,244].”
- A new efficient numerical method for contact mechanics of rough surfaces (2012, methodology): “Later models have used random process theory to make the asperity curvature depending on their heights or have resorted to an apparently different approach that uses fractal theories to recognize more directly the multiscale nature of most real surface (Greenwood, 2006).”