Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic Reviews. A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme. Version 1
By J. Popay, Helen Roberts, A. Sowden, M. Petticrew, Lisa Arai, Mark Rodgers, Nicky Britten. 2006
456 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c1942e95b5e32206b173be1176e4d9288c54a10
Citations in the corpus
- Bibliometric visualisation: an application in tourism crisis and disaster management research (2019, unknown): “This method of analysis involves the systematic review and synthesis of findings from multiple studies that rely primarily on the use of words and text to summarise and explain the findings of the synthesis (Popay et al., 2006, p. 5).”
- A narrative systematic review of life skills education: effectiveness, research gaps and priorities (2018, unknown): “According to Popay et al. (2006), the type of data to be extracted should be based on the review questions.”
- Narrative approaches to systematic review and synthesis of evidence for international development policy and practice (2012, unknown): “Popay et al. (2006) provide a guidance on how narrative synthesis can be conducted in a more systematic and transparent way, focusing on synthesis of evidence on effectiveness of interventions and factors determining the implementation of interventions.”