What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving.
By Kathrin Zeeb, Axel Buchner, M. Schrauf. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2015
476 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c0e1c94b0c26fbcf410306fdf4cbaaaeb1e29ff
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Taking Over Control From Highly Automated Vehicles in Complex Traffic Situations (2016, background): “This cognitive distraction is noteworthy as cognitive distraction impairs the takeover performance (Radlmayr et al., 2014), and the cognitive takeover process is considered more critical than the motoric reorientation to the driving task (Zeeb et al., 2015).”
- Human factors of transitions in automated driving: A general framework and literature survey (2016, background): “…Gold, Damböck et al., 2013; Lorenz, Kerschbaum, & Schumann, 2014; Radlmayr, Gold, Lorenz, Farid, & Bengler, 2014; Naujoks, Purucker, Neukum, Wolter, & Steiger, 2015; Petermeijer, De Winter, & Bengler, 2016; Telpaz, Rhindress, Zelman, & Tsimhoni, 2015; Willemsen et al., 2014; Zeeb et al., 2015).”
- Driver-Activity Recognition in the Context of Conditionally Autonomous Driving (2015, background): “A typical viewing behavior during a secondary task in the context of autonomous driving are gazes away from the secondary tasks towards the road [22] before returning the gaze towards the secondary task.”