Assessing the impact of Impatiens glandulifera on riparian habitats: partitioning diversity components following species removal
By P. Hulme, E. Bremner. 2005
289 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c05423d2d99185dcf1db04f48dfc82b5ff9fd9b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Insect Science
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- The role of research for integrated management of invasive species, invaded landscapes and communities (2008, background): “The management process itself may promote reinvasion by the same or a different invasive species (Zavaleta et al . 2001; Courchamp et al . 2003; Hulme & Bremner 2006; Buckley, Bolker & Rees 2007; Cox & Allen 2008), or recovery of the native community may be dependent on ecological processes such a”
- Classical biological control: exploiting enemy escape to manage plant invasions (2008, background): “Removing the invasive plant Impatiens glandulifera from riparian habitats resulted in an increase in plant species richness, but a significant number of species recolonizing such sites were other exotic species (Hulme and Bremner 2006).”
- Assessing grassland restoration success: relative roles of seed additions and native ungulate activities (2006, background): “Increases in exotic or cosmopolitan weed species may negatively impact diversity and are a primary concern in grazed grasslands (Smith & Knapp 1999; Hulme & Bremner 2006).”
- Eucalyptus invasions in riparian forests: Effects on native vegetation community diversity, stand structure and composition (2013, methodology): “obscure the true impact of specific invasive species (Hulme and Bremner, 2006; Truscott et al., 2008).”
- Beyond control : wider implications for the management of biological invasions (2006, background): “Removing the invasive Himalayan balsam from riparian habitats resulted in an increase in plant species richness, but the most responsive species were other aliens ( Hulme & Bremner 2006 ).”
- Impact of three aquatic invasive species on native plants and macroinvertebrates in temperate ponds (2011, background): “The loss of biodiversity associated with the invasion of alien species concerns mostly other ruderal or alien species (Hulme and Bremner 2006).”
- Biological consequences of invasion by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) (2009, background): “…beta and gamma diversity) by the cumulative effects of local extirpations (for RCG, see Aronson and Galatowitsch 2008; for other invasive plants, see Hulme and Bremner 2006; Hejda et al. 2009) is cause for considerable concern given this invaders widespread dominance (Gaston and Fuller 2007).”
- Alien Vascular Plants of Europe (2009, background): “…balsam Impatiens glandulifera; under some circumstances the invasion of this species does not necessarily result in loss of the diversity of invaded communities, only in shifts in species composition towards ruderal, nitrogen demanding species (Hejda and Pyšek 2006, but see Hulme and Bremner 2006).”
- Stability of exotic annual grasses following restoration efforts in southern California coastal sage scrub (2008, background): “Increases in non-native species following removal of an undesirable exotic are known from other ecosystems, such as the removal of Impatiens glandulifera that promoted proportionally greater increases in exotic than native species in a riparian system in England (Hulme & Bremner 2005).”
- Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities (2009, background): “Our results confirm that Mimulus guttatus and Impatiens glandulifera exhibit minor impact on the characteristics of the invaded communities studied (Hulme & Bremner 2006, Hejda & Pysek 2006, 2008, Truscott et al. 2008).”
- Invasive plant removal method determines native plant community responses (2009, methodology): “…that test the efficiency of multiple removal methods and their effects on native communities can aid in the development of appropriate restoration strategies and help to quantify the impacts of plant invaders on native communities (D’Antonio et al. 1998; Diaz et al. 2003; Hulme & Bremner 2006).”