Species‐Richness Correlations of Six Different Taxa in Swedish Seminatural Grasslands
By Karolina Vessby, B. Söderström, A. Glimskär, B. Svensson. 2002
180 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2bf7f36458dc793a49e63f8e3c60e436f756e003
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Surrogate taxa for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes of eastern Austria (2004, background): “This contradicts some of the published opinion on the usefulness of surrogate taxa (Pimm and Lawton, 1998; Lawton and Gaston, 2001; Vessby et al., 2002).”
- Importance of boreal grasslands in Sweden for butterfly diversity and effects of local and landscape habitat factors (2007, background): “In general plant diversity has a positive eVect on butterXy diversity although grazing pressaure may aVect diversity negatively in unfertilised grasslands (Erhard and Thomas 1991, Vessby et al. 2002) One other factor to consider in this study is that the results may also reXect landscape history.”
- Performance of Macrolichens and Lichen Genera as Indicators of Lichen Species Richness and Composition (2005, background): “…of different, often unrelated taxa such as birds and plants or invertebrates (e.g., Prendergast et al. 1993; Lawton et al. 1998; Negi & Gadgil 2002; Vessby et al. 2002), or (3) numbers of species and numbers of supraspecific taxa such as genera or families (e.g., Williams & Gaston 1994; Andersen…”
- How do local habitat management and landscape structure at different spatial scales affect fritillary butterfly distribution on fragmented wetlands? (2008, background): “Butterflies are adequate indicators of change for many terrestrial insect groups (Thomas 2005, but see Vessby et al. 2002) and often occur in metapopulations (Hanski 1999).”
- Identifying practical indicators of biodiversity for stand-level management of plantation forests (2008, result): “…of one group reflects diversity in another, unrelated group—are the focus of much recent conservation biology research, with mixed results (e.g. Howard et al. 1998; Vessby et al. 2002; Sætersdal et al. 2003; Anand et al. 2005; Oertli et al. 2005; Williams et al. 2006; Similä et al. 2006).”
- Indirect evidence for an extinction debt of grassland butterflies half century after habitat loss (2010, background): “Similarly, no correlation between species richness of butterflies and vascular plants was found in Swedish seminatural grasslands and pastures (Vessby et al., 2002; Weibull et al., 2003; see also Sharp et al., 1974).”
- RESTORATION OF BUTTERFLY AND MOTH COMMUNITIES IN SEMI-NATURAL GRASSLANDS BY CATTLE GRAZING (2004, background): “…with respect to other organisms has until very recently been lacking (Niemelä and Baur 1998, Kruess and Tscharntke 2002b, WallisDeVries et al. 2002, Vessby et al. 2002), similar intensive grazing regimes have been widely applied in the management of semi-natural habitats in many European…”
- Emerging issues and challenges in conservation of biodiversity in the rangelands of Tanzania (2013, background): “The presumed effects on plant diversity have not been unequivocally verified, compared to the relatively lower and more varied grazing pressure before 1995 in Sweden (Söderström et al. 2001; Vessby et al. 2002).”
- A Successful Predictive Model of Species Richness Based on Indicator Species (2004, background): “…on the richness of an entire biota (all vertebrates, invertebrates, and plants) at scales meaningful for most land-use decisions (Prendergast et al. 1993; Mac Nally et al. 2002; Vessby et al. 2002), indicators still may be effective within limited taxonomic boundaries (Fleishman et al. 2000).”