Improving Symbolic Regression with Interval Arithmetic and Linear Scaling
By Maarten Keijzer. European Conference on Genetic Programming, 2003
392 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2bf4a3c0a91b8d97dbc9df66c917c77eded82e37
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Nguyen Xuan Hoai
- Nguyen Quang Uy
- Michael O'Neill
- Edgar Galván López
- Ekaterina Vladislavleva
- Guido Smits
- Dick den Hertog
- Robert Ian (Bob) McKay
Citations in the corpus
- Order of Nonlinearity as a Complexity Measure for Models Generated by Symbolic Regression via Pareto Genetic Programming (2009, methodology): “The choice of several target expressions was inspired by [42], which introduced 13 functions to analyze the performance of scaled GP.”
- Interpretable scientific discovery with symbolic regression: a review (2022, neutral): “In symbolic regression case, the encoder and the decoder do not share the same vocabulary because the decoder has a mixture of symbolic and numeric representations, while the encoder has only numeric representations.”
- Semantically-based crossover in genetic programming: application to real-valued symbolic regression (2011, methodology): “By contrast, Keijzer [33] used interval analysis to check whether an individual is defined over the whole range of input values—if an individual is undefined anywhere, that individual can be assigned minimal fitness or simply deleted from the population.”