Printable anodes for flexible organic solar cell modules
By Tom Aernouts, P. Vanlaeke, W. Geens, Jef Poortmans, Paul Heremans, S. Borghs, R. Mertens, R. Andriessen, L. Leenders. 2004
248 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Polymers and Plastics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2bf3adf387e14e6dfe62cb1b18f7a0ca68d7fb17
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
In Polymers and Plastics
Citations in the corpus
- Effect of P3HT:PCBM concentration in solvent on performances of organic solar cells (2009, unknown): “Because of these practical device advantages, studies have focused on stability [1–7], large area processing [8–12], indium tin oxide (ITO) free transparent electrodes [13–16], etc.”
- Polymer- and carbon-based electrodes for polymer solar cells: Toward low-cost, continuous fabrication over large area (2012, methodology): “Either evaporation [106,111,114–117] or printing techniques [79,82,105,107–113] are used for the grid deposition.”
- Polymer–fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells (2010, methodology): “Also, anodes were produced by screen printing [315].”
- Transparent electrodes for organic optoelectronic devices: a review (2014, background): “In summary, transparent polymers, especially the highly conductive PEDOT:PSS, are possible ITO substitutes for TEs, due to their high flexibility and excellent compatibility with largearea, solution-processed coating techniques.(12,165,166) The conductivity of PEDOT:PSS film is approaching that of I”