Predictions and their validation: Rare plants in the Central Highlands, Victoria, Australia
By Jane Elith, Mark A. Burgman. 2002
157 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2be6941221aba29c0c2105135475eb7880f2c2a8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Miguel B. Araújo
- Wilfried Thuiller
- A. Townsend Peterson
- A. Jiménez‐Valverde
- Antoine Guisan
- Jane Elith
- Jorge M. Lobo
- Richard G. Pearson
Citations in the corpus
- Does the interpolation accuracy of species distribution models come at the expense of transferability (2012, background): “(2007), and Elith and Graham (2009) where the good performance of MAXENT and GBM is concerned, which apparently includes also good transferability (Duncan et al.”
- Presence-absence versus presence-only modelling methods for predicting bird habitat suitability (2004, methodology): “…adjustment to data and variation in data quality, habitat distribution modelling methods will likely cover different application areas and ECOGRAPHY 27:4 (2004) 445 it will be impossible to identify one among them as universally applicable (Elith and Burgman 2002a, b, Segurado and Araújo 2004).”
- An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo-absence data (2004, background): “…relatively few predictive models have been applied to rare and endangered species (Miller 1986; Myatt 1987; Carey & Brown 1995; Godown & Peterson 2000; Elith & Burgman 2002), despite their potential in conservation management, for instance in identifying sites with high potential for colonization.”
- Species-specific traits associated to prediction errors in bird habitat suitability modelling (2005, background): “In fact, predictive accuracy varies more among species than among modelling techniques (Elith and Burgman, 2002; Thuiller et al., 2003).”
- Conservatism of ecological niche characteristics in North American plant species over the Pleistocene‐to‐Recent transition (2006, unknown): “While these tests in geographic space are standard means of validating such model predictions (Fielding & Bell, 1997; Elith & Burgman, 2002; Scott et al., 2002), ecological niche models should rightly be validated in ecological space to avoid pseudoreplication of test points (Soberón & Peterson,…”
- A comparative evaluation of presence‐only methods for modelling species distribution (2007, methodology): “Similar results were reported in studies comparing other modelling techniques (e.g. Manel et al ., 1999; Elith & Burgman, 2002; Thuiller et al ., 2003; Berg et al ., 2004).”
- Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data (2006, unknown): “To date, few models have been validated via collection of new data (but see Ferrier and Watson 1997, Elith and Burgman 2002, Raxworthy et al. 2003, Peterson 2005).”
- Pushing the limits in marine species distribution modelling: lessons from the land present challenges and opportunities (2011, background): “…planning, climate change adaptation, biosecurity (species invasion and disease), testing principles of theoretical ecology and understanding processes that drive biogeographic patterns (Elith & Burgman, 2002; Thomas et al., 2004; Pearson et al., 2007; Le Maitre et al., 2008; Kharouba et al., 2009).”
- Evaluating predictive models of species’ distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models (2003, background): “…algorithms that identify only one solution (distributional prediction), such as generalized linear models, bioclimatic-envelope methods, and others (Busby, 1986; Nicholls, 1989; Walker and Cocks, 1991; Box et al., 1993; Carpenter et al., 1993; Jarvis and Robertson, 1999; Elith and Burgman, 2002).”
- Predicting species distributions: a critical comparison of the most common statistical models using artificial species (2007, result): “As with other comparative studies (Franklin, 1998; Elith & Burgman, 2002; Thuiller et al., 2003; Segurado & Araújo, 2004), these two modelling strategies seem to represent a good trade-off between model complexity and performance for a diverse set of species.”
- Habitat suitability for marine fishes using presence-only modelling and multibeam sonar (2010, background): “…compared more than 3 different methods on the same data, and the majority of these have focused on terrestrial, freshwater or simulated datasets (Elith & Burgman 2002, Ferrier et al. 2002b, Olden & Jackson 2002, Farber & Kadmon 2003, Loiselle et al. 2003, Brotons et al. 2004, Segurado & Araújo…”
- Spatially autocorrelated sampling falsely inflates measures of accuracy for presence‐only niche models (2009, methodology): “Simply using the same data to build the model and evaluate predictions (resubstitution) leads to overly optimistic views of the model’s accuracy (Elith & Burgman, 2002).”
- The derivation of species response curves with Gaussian logistic regression is sensitive to sampling intensity and curve characteristics (2006, background): “Indeed, knowing theminimum value for species occurrence is very important when dealingwith rare species (Wiser et al., 1998; Pearce and Ferrier, 2000a, 2000b; Elith and Burgman, 2002; Edwards et al., 2004).”