Do Economics Journal Archives Promote Replicable Research

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The aid effectiveness literature: The sad results of 40 years of research (2009, unknown): “replication by researcher B of the results of researcher A on the same data – has failed (see Dewald et al., 1986; McCullough et al., 2006).”
The Impact of Microcredit on the Poor in Bangladesh: Revisiting the Evidence (2014, unknown): “For a sustained perspective on the problems posed for the advancement of social science, see McCullough and Vinod (2003), McCullough et al. (2008), and McCullough and McKitrick (2009).”
Open Access to Data: An Ideal Professed but Not Practised (2014, background): “…policies that rely on encouraged data-sharing upon request rather than enforcement mechanisms often fail and, thus, are not sufficient to satisfy the ideal standard of data availability (Dewald et al., 1986; Feigenbaum and Levy, 1993; McCullough et al., 2008; McCullough and Vinod, 2003).”
High Noon for Microfinance Impact Evaluations: Re-investigating the Evidence from Bangladesh (2012, background): “Economics papers applying complex statistical methods can, apparently quite frequently, have errors of both variable construction (data manipulation) and statistical estimation (Dewald et al., 1986; McCullough et al., 2006; McCullough et al., 2008).”