Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration

By K. Hufford, S. Mazer. 2003

914 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b9ed9be40d2d4262705aaa6c84305cd011eca9f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Seed provenance matters — Effects on germination of four plant species used for ecological restoration (2006, background): “The provenance of seed material used in ecological restoration or habitat creation is subject of an ongoing debate (Hamilton, 2001; Hufford & Mazer, 2003; Wilkinson, 2001).”
Pacific Northwest Forest Tree Seed Zones: A Template for Native Plants? (2004, background): “Similarly, British Columbia has developed 21 geographic zones (Figure 1; Illingworth and Szalkai 1993) that are modified as new information becomes available.”
The role of intraspecific hybridization in the evolution of invasiveness: a case study of the ornamental pear tree Pyrus calleryana (2009, background): “Intraspecific hybridization has been carried out artificially for centuries to improve agriculturally or horticulturally important plant species (Khanduri and Sharma 2002; Johnston et al. 2003), but it has rarely been examined in natural populations, with few exceptions ( Hufford and Mazer 2003; Er”
Testing population differentiation in plant species - how important are environmental maternal effects (2010, neutral): “…in applied studies comparing the success of diff erent populations for restoration or re-vegetation purposes (Keller and Kollmann 1999, Huff ord and Mazer 2003, Smith et al. 2005, Bischoff et al. 2006a) environmental maternal eff ects represent an important part of the diff erentiation that…”
Post-wildfire seeding in forests of the western United States: An evidence-based review (2010, background): “…and restoration have arisen based on concern that using native seed from distant sources may contaminate local gene pools (Huenneke, 1991; Schmid, 1994; Linhart, 1995; Hufford and Mazer, 2003; Rogers and Montalvo, 2004); however, limited research has actually been conducted on the topic.”
Genetic identity of interspecific neighbours mediates plant responses to competition and environmental variation in a species‐rich grassland (2007, background): “Conservation and restoration of grassland communities can be hampered by insufficient consideration of the genetic composition of existing or sown populations (Knapp & Rice 1996; Hufford & Mazer 2003 ).”
Can an Ecoregion Serve as a Seed Transfer Zone? Evidence from a Common Garden Study with Five Native Species (2011, background): “…adapted plant materials are widely recommended because of their increased chances of establishment success and lower potential for genetic swamping of surrounding populations with maladaptive genes (Lesica & Allendorf 1999; Hufford & Mazer 2003; Rogers & Montalvo 2004; Gustafson et al. 2005).”
Assessing the benefits and risks of translocations in changing environments: a genetic perspective (2011, background): “…that are prone to genetic drift and therefore maladaptation; Lopez et al. 2009) that ‘genetic pollution’ by alien genotypes with a strong competitive ability (Saltonstall 2002) is limited (sensu Potts et al. 2003) and that outbreeding depression is avoided (see Box 1; Hufford and Mazer 2003).”
Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximizing evolutionary potential (2008, background): “These expectations are largely borne out by evidence (Ennos et al. 1998; Hufford and Mazer 2003).”
A sturgeon view on conservation genetics (2006, background): “Strictly speaking, hybrid breakdown is a reduction in fitness associated with the disruption of epistatic interactions among loci (Hufford and Mazer 2003).”
Genetic differentiation within multiple common grassland plants supports seed transfer zones for ecological restoration (2017, background): “The use of local seed sources is also an important means to conserve genetic biodiversity (Krauss et al. 2013), and it reduces the risks of genetic swamping and of outbreeding depression (Hufford & Mazer 2003).”
The Importance of Plant Provenance and Genotypic Diversity of Seed Material Used for Ecological Restoration (2008, background): “If seeds are collected from a limited number of sources, the level of genetic diversity is low and genetic bottlenecks may occur in the restored populations (Hufford & Mazer 2003).”
Hybridization as a conservation management tool (2019, background): “Enhancing adaptive potential of a population via hybridization is currently an underutilized management choice due to its perceived risks (Fitzpatrick et al., 2016; Frankham et al., 2011; Hufford & Mazer 2003) and limitations in its existing legal framework (Wayne & Shaffer 2016).”