Reversible myocardial dysfunction in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
By I. Laurent, M. Monchi, J. Chiche, L. Joly, C. Spaulding, B. Bourgeois, A. Cariou, A. Rozenberg, P. Carli, S. Weber and 1 more. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002
705 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Emergency Medicine, Epidemiology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b7ecb5af31aab077d4840f8b2519474a11cd53a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Emergency Medicine
Citations in the corpus
- Intensive care unit mortality after cardiac arrest: the relative contribution of shock and brain injury in a large cohort (2013, background): “[12].”
- Part 8: Post–Cardiac Arrest Care (2015, neutral): “One bundle with a goal of MAP over 75 mm Hg found no change in functional recovery at hospital discharge.(36) One bundle with”
- European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Guidelines 2021: Post-resuscitation care. (2021, methodology): “Haemodynamic monitoring and management Haemodynamic monitoring Post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction and low cardiac index may occur in up to 60% of post-cardiac arrest patients [30, 118] and may be even more common in patients with an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) as the cause of the arrest”
- European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Guidelines for Post-resuscitation Care 2015: Section 5 of the European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015. (2015, background): “272,273 In non-TTM-treated patients276,285 an absent or extensor motor response to pain at 72 h from ROSC has a high (74 [68–79]%) sensitivity for prediction of poor outcome, but the FPR is also high (27 [12–48]%).”