Affect, Social Pressure and Prosocial Motivation: Field Experimental Evidence of the Mobilizing Effects of Pride, Shame and Publicizing Voting Behavior

239 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Risk of Over-Reliance on the Institutional Review Board: An Approved Project Is Not Always an Ethical Project (2016, background): “A 2007 GOTV eff ort informing citizens that their name would appear in the newspaper after the election indicating whether they had voted generated suffi cient concern from local election offi cials that the names were never published (Panagopoulos 2010 ).”
Explaining Group Influence: The Role of Identity and Emotion in Political Conformity and Polarization (2015, background): “Similar to Noelle-Neuman (1993), 4 Gerber, Green, and Larimer (2008, 2010) and Panagopoulos (2010) argue that the desire to feel pride and avoid embarrassment or shame motivates citizens to conform to voting norms in their communities.”
Is There Backlash to Social Pressure? A Large-scale Field Experiment on Voter Mobilization (2010, background): “However, a single mailer delivering a social pressure message about the surveillance of voting has generated impressive increases in turnout in several recent field experiments (Gerber et al. 2008, 2010; Grose and Russell 2008; Panagopoulos 2010 ).”