Governmental and independent venture capital investments in Europe: a firm-level performance analysis

320 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The patterns of venture capital investment in Europe (2015, methodology): “Croce et al. 2013; Grilli and Murtinu 2014; Cumming et al. 2014; Colombo et al. 2014a; Grilli and Murtinu 2015).6 The VICO database includes 759 VC-backed companies that received their first round of VC investment between 1994 and 2004 and were\10 years old at that time.”
Does governmental venture capital spur invention and innovation? Evidence from young European biotech companies (2015, methodology): “…(2014) findings from a large international sample confirm that GVCs are beneficial to successful exits only when they syndicate with private VCs and when the private VC provides a large fraction of funds.8 Cumming et al. (2014) obtain similar results on a sample extracted from the VICO database.”
Governmental venture capital in Europe: Screening and certification (2016, background): “If entrepreneurial companies that went through the double screening of GVC and PVC are more promising (Cumming et al. 2014; Brander et al. 2015), they should be more likely to have a successful exit than other PVC-backed companies.”
Institutions and Entrepreneurship Quality (2018, background): “, 2016), bankruptcy law (Armour & Cumming, 2006, 2008) and government programs to support entrepreneurship (Cumming et al., 2017; Cumming & Johan, 2013), Although the prior literature has demonstrated that the size and strength of the relationship between institutions and entrepreneurship varies wit”