Do Bilateral Tax Treaties Promote Foreign Direct Investment?

By Bruce A. Blonigen, Ronald B. Davies. 2002

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b6c157f92af386284a1f400fc1c2032000407a2

Citations in the corpus

• FDI promotion through bilateral investment treaties: more than a bit? (2010, unknown): “40 In the context of tax treaties, Blonigen and Davies (2005) refer to concerns that such treaties arise due to lobbying efforts by profit-seeking investors.”
• Tax Treaties and Foreign Direct Investment: Potential versus Performance (2004, unknown): “Similar to Blonigen and Davies (forthcoming) , this coefficient is negative.”
• The Impact of Double Taxation Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from Large Dyadic Panel Data (2009, unknown): “…representative monadic country year sample (Di Giovanni, 2005; Neumayer, 2007), or, where they used bilateral FDI data, they have suffered from a small and unrepresentative dyad year sample (Blonigen and Davies, 2004, 2005; Coupé, Orlova, and Skiba, 2008; Davies, 2003, 2004; Egger et al., 2006).”
• Tax treaty shopping: structural determinants of Foreign Direct Investment routed through the Netherlands (2013, unknown): “Blonigen and Davies (2008) and Egger et al. (2006) find negative effects of new tax treaties on FDI, whereas Coupé et al. (2008) find no significant effects.”
• International Tax Competition and Coordination (2014, unknown): “Also relevant here is the literature on double tax agreements, which has been primarily focused on whether these have encouraged capital movements: see for example Blonigen and Davies (2004).”
• Do double taxation treaties increase foreign direct investment to developing countries? (2006, unknown): “Second, for the one developed country for which comprehensive outbound FDI data exist, namely the United States, we create a more representative sample of developing countries that also covers a longer time period than is the case in Blonigen and Davies (2004). The larger sample is partly due to ext”