Comparison between controlled laboratory experiments and discrete particle simulations of the mechanical behaviour of rock

By R. Holt, J. Kjølaas, I. Larsen, Liming Li, A. Pillitteri, E. Sønstebø. 2005

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Numerical Investigation of Dynamic Rock Fracture Toughness Determination Using a Semi-Circular Bend Specimen in Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing (2016, methodology): “In addition, since dynamics is an inherent feature of DEM, explicit algorithms are utilized to simulate dynamic problems, as evidenced by elastic wave propagation modeling (Holt et al. 2005), induced seismicity (Hazzard and Young 2004), dynamic loading at a high rate (Hentz et al.”
The contribution of DEM to the science of comminution (2013, methodology): “[146] used assemblies of glass beads under controlled laboratory experiments to validate DEM mechanical behaviour of rock, and then looked into fundamental mechanisms of rock deformation and failure.”
A Study of Three Intrinsic Problems of the Classic Discrete Element Method Using Flat-Joint Model (2016, background): “It is now applied in a wide range of studies, such as those in the fields of rock engineering (Katsaga and Potyondy 2012; Wang et al. 2003; Zhina et al. 2008), petroleum (Holt et al. 2005; Yang et al. 2012), ice movement (Zyryanov and Korsnes 2002), and even Valles Marineris on Mars (Imre 2004).”