Domain Generalization using Causal Matching
By Divyat Mahajan, Shruti Tople, Amit Sharma. International Conference on Machine Learning, 2020
409 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Learning invariant representations has been proposed as a key technique for addressing the domain generalization problem. However, the question of identifying the right conditions for invariance remains unanswered. In this work, we propose a causal interpretation of domain generalization that defines domains as interventions under a data-generating process. Based on a general causal model for data from multiple domains, we show that prior methods for learning an invariant representation optimize for an incorrect objective. We highlight an alternative condition: inputs across domains should have the same representation if they are derived from the same base object. In practice, knowledge about generation of data or objects is not available. Hence we propose an iterative algorithm called MatchDG that approximates base object similarity by using a contrastive loss formulation adapted for multiple domains. We then match inputs that are similar under the resultant representation to build an invariant classifier. We evaluate MatchDG on rotated MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and PACS datasets and find that it outperforms prior work on out-of-domain accuracy and learns matches that have over 25\% overlap with ground-truth object matches in MNIST and Fashion-MNIST. Code repository can be accessed here: \textit{this https URL}
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b5a8e6fd214e1471c5d61bf80e4ff9f774765b6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Citations in the corpus
- Towards Out-Of-Distribution Generalization: A Survey (2021, background): “…Causal Learning & Invariant Learning ( Section 4.2 ) [10], [106], [107], [108], [109], [110](Section 4.2.2) [2], [3], [56], [111], [112], [113], [114], [115], [116], [117](Section 4.2.3) Stable Learning ( Section 4.3 ) [4], [12], [13], [118], [119], [120], [121], [122], [123], [124](Section…”
- Generalizing to Unseen Domains: A Survey on Domain Generalization (2021, methodology): “…modeling: DIVA [124]/ DAL [125]/ M-ADA [40]/ DDG [126]/ SagNet [127]/ GILE [128] RobustNet [129]/ [130] Causality-inspired methods: MatchDG [76] is an active research area and other researchers also derived different DG theory bounds using informativeness [168] and adversarial training…”
- The Risks of Invariant Risk Minimization (2020, background): “Many papers have suggested similar alternatives (Jin et al., 2020; Mahajan et al., 2020; Bellot & van der Schaar, 2020).”