On the plausibility of claiming a métonymie motivation for conceptual metaphor

By A. Barcelona. 2003

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b5396035f0bad2d41892a7cb4735f69a8400063

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Benjamin K. Bergen
2. Z. Kövecses

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Z. Kövecses
2. Benjamin K. Bergen
3. Joerg Zinken
4. V. Evans
5. Raymond W. Gibbs Jr.
6. Péter Csatár
7. Rafael E. Núñez
8. Derek M. Jones

In Language and Linguistics

1. Z. Kövecses
2. Benjamin K. Bergen
3. Joerg Zinken
4. V. Evans
5. Raymond W. Gibbs Jr.
6. Péter Csatár
7. Derek M. Jones
8. Luc Steels

Citations in the corpus

• The Metaphor–Metonymy Relationship: Correlation Metaphors Are Based on Metonymy (2013, methodology): “…the inevitably partial structure of the source, B, is used to conceptualize an equally inevitable part of the target, A, resulting in the metonymies “A PART OF B FOR THE WHOLE OF B and A PART OF A FOR THE WHOLE OF A,” given the general metaphor format A IS B (see, especially, Barcelona, 2000).”
• The cognitive linguistics enterprise: an overview (2007, background): “, Taylor, 2003; Radden, 2001), and some have gone so far as to claim that metaphor itself has a metonymic basis (Barcelona, 2001).”