A critical review on recent advancements of the removal of reactive dyes from dyehouse effluent by ion-exchange adsorbents.

By M. M. Hassan, C. Carr. Chemosphere, 2018

691 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The effluent discharged by the textile dyehouses has a seriously detrimental effect on the aquatic environment. Some dyestuffs produce toxic decomposition products and the metal complex dyes release toxic heavy metals to watercourses. Of the dyes used in the textile industry, effluents containing reactive dyes are the most difficult to treat because of their high water-solubility and poor absorption into the fibers. A range of treatments has been investigated for the decolorization of textile effluent and the adsorption seems to be one of the cheapest, effective and convenient treatments. In this review, the adsorbents investigated in the last decade for the treatment of textile effluent containing reactive dyes including modified clays, biomasses, chitin and its derivatives, and magnetic ion-exchanging particles have been critically reviewed and their reactive dye binding capacities have been compiled and compared. Moreover, the dye binding mechanism, dye sorption isotherm models and also the merits/demerits of various adsorbents are discussed. This review also includes the current challenges and the future directions for the development of adsorbents that meet these challenges. The adsorption capacities of adsorbents depend on various factors, such as the chemical structures of dyes, the ionic property, surface area, porosity of the adsorbents, and the operating conditions. It is evident from the literature survey that decolorization by the adsorption shows a great promise for the removal of color from dyehouse effluent. If biomasses want to compete with the established ion-exchange resins and activated carbon, their dye binding capacity will need to be substantially improved.

Subfields: Analytical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Water Science and Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b4a16941859123609574f3fdd717a9f375f79f9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Analytical Chemistry

  1. Sunita Varjani
  2. Wenshan Guo
  3. H. Ngo

In Organic Chemistry

  1. Wenshan Guo
  2. H. Ngo

In Water Science and Technology

  1. H. Ngo
  2. Wenshan Guo
  3. M. Benchanaa
  4. R. Chikri
  5. N. Elhadiri
  6. Y. E. maguana

Citations in the corpus