Lower bounds on the performance of polynomial-time algorithms for sparse linear regression

By Yuchen Zhang, Martin J. Wainwright, Michael I. Jordan. 2014

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Under a standard assumption in complexity theory (NP 6⊂P/poly), we demonstrate a gap between the minimax prediction risk for sparse linear regression that can be achieved by polynomial-time algorithms, and that achieved by optimal algorithms. In particular, when the design matrix is ill-conditioned, the minimax prediction loss achievable by polynomial-time algorithms can be substantially greater than that of an optimal algorithm. This result is the first known gap between polynomial and optimal algorithms for sparse linear regression, and does not depend on conjectures in average-case complexity.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Mechanics, Signal Processing

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Ilias Diakonikolas
  2. Jacob Steinhardt
  3. Percy Liang
  4. Michael I. Jordan
  5. Daniel M. Kane
  6. Alistair Stewart
  7. Chi Jin
  8. John C. Duchi

In Computational Mechanics

  1. Michael I. Jordan
  2. Chi Jin
  3. John C. Duchi
  4. Ilias Diakonikolas
  5. Alistair Stewart
  6. Daniel M. Kane
  7. Nilesh Tripuraneni
  8. Zeyuan Allen-Zhu

In Signal Processing

  1. Alistair Stewart
  2. Michael I. Jordan
  3. John C. Duchi
  4. Ilias Diakonikolas
  5. Nilesh Tripuraneni
  6. Daniel M. Kane
  7. Chi Jin
  8. Jacob Steinhardt

Citations in the corpus