CHAOS—a model of the Earth's magnetic field derived from CHAMP, Ørsted, and SAC‐C magnetic satellite data
By Nils Olsen, Hermann Lühr, T. Sabaka, Mioara Mandea, Martin K. A. Rother, L. Tøffner‐Clausen, Sungchan Choi. 2006
264 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Geophysics, Molecular Biology, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b42da3b08a14cf6029ccd06fdb522aeb328ed35
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geophysics
- Mioara Mandea
- M. Purucker
- T. Sabaka
- Nils Olsen
- Christopher C. Finlay
- Hermann Lühr
- L. Tøffner‐Clausen
- B. Langlais
In Molecular Biology
- Nils Olsen
- Mioara Mandea
- T. Sabaka
- Christopher C. Finlay
- M. Purucker
- D. Jault
- Maria Alexandra Pais
- Hermann Lühr
In Oceanography
- Nils Olsen
- Christopher C. Finlay
- Mioara Mandea
- Hermann Lühr
- M. Purucker
- T. Sabaka
- Maria Alexandra Pais
- D. Jault
Citations in the corpus
- Rapidly changing flows in the Earth's core (2008, background): “As a result of continuous satellite measurements since 1999, the core magnetic field and its recent variations can now be described with a high resolution in space and tim”
- Quasi-geostrophic flows responsible for the secular variation of the Earth's magnetic field (2008, methodology): “2 from (Olsen et al., 2006)).”
- Resolution of direction of oceanic magnetic lineations by the sixth‐generation lithospheric magnetic field model from CHAMP satellite magnetic measurements (2008, background): “[12] It has been recognized for some time that unfiltered field models, such as CM4 [Sabaka et al., 2004], GRIMM [Lesur et al., 2008], CHAOS [Olsen et al., 2006] and POMME-4 (http://geomag. org/models/pomme4.html) have higher power levels than the MF series of models.”
- The Magnetic Field of the Earth’s Lithosphere (2010, methodology): “The CHAOS (Olsen et al. 2006) and CHAOS-2 (Olsen et al. 2009a) models, and GRIMM (Lesur et al. 2008), for instance, propose different ways of modelling the main field, its secular variation and acceleration for the past 10 years (2000–2010) but do not resolve the lithospheric field better than SH de”
- The CHAOS-4 Geomagnetic Field Model (2013, methodology): “Experiments based on Swarm-type synthetic data indicate that the lithospheric field up to degree n = 150 can be robustly determined without along-track filtering (Sabaka & Olsen 2006; Olsen et al. 2007; Tøffner-Clausen et al. 2010; Sabaka et al. 2013).”