Irrigation scheduling protocols using continuously recorded trunk diameter measurements

By D. Goldhamer, Elías Fereres. Irrigation science, 2001

283 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Mechanical Engineering, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b31e0db1f5e3e2713bed767e7df1d3e786eec0e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Mechanical Engineering

In Soil Science

Citations in the corpus

Usefulness of establishing trunk diameter based reference lines for irrigation scheduling in almond trees (2009, methodology): “Measurements of trunk diameter fluctuations (TDF), which permit continuous and automated registers of the changes in tree water status, have demonstrated their sensitiveness to changes in tree water supply in a number of fruit tree species (Huguet et al. 1992; Goldhamer and Fereres 2001; Moriana and”
Plant indicators for scheduling irrigation of young olive trees (2002, background): “In general, significant changes in the MXTD and MNTD of the deficit trees relative to the control occurred a few days earlier than when we detected a lowering of stem w in deficit below that of control trees.”
Maximum daily trunk shrinkage and stem water potential reference equations for irrigation scheduling of lemon trees (2008, background): “Maximum daily trunk shrinkage (MDS), the diVerence between maximum trunk diameter early in the morning and minimum trunk diameter early in the afternoon, provides continuous and automatic information of the plant water status (Goldhamer and Fereres 2001; Ortuño et al. 2004a, b; Naor 2006; Ortuño et ”
Assessment of trunk diameter variation derived indices as water stress indicators in mature olive trees (2010, methodology): “To evaluate the suitability of these TDV-derived indices for rrigation scheduling, we calculated their signal strength, variabilty and sensitivity (Goldhamer and Fereres, 2001; Fernández and uevas, 2010).”
Thermographic measurement of canopy temperature is a useful tool for predicting water deficit effects on fruit weight in citrus trees (2013, background): “Many are the studies comparing different plant water stress indicators on the base of a signal to noise ratio (Ballester et al., 2013b; Goldhamer and Fereres, 2001; Ortuño et al., 2004; Remorini and Massai, 2003).”
Evaluation of grapevine water status from trunk diameter variations (2007, methodology): “At the present time, monitoring trunk diameter variations (TDV) is widely used to detect plant water status (Goldhamer and Fereres 2001; Naor 2006) Two indices derived from TDV have been employed as possible plant water status indicators: (1) trunk growth”
Evaluation of plant-based water status indicators in mature apple trees under field conditions (2007, background): “The ratio found for midday stem was near those reported for plum (Intrigliolo and Castel 2004) and almond trees (Goldhamer and Fereres 2001), with similar signal and variability, and slightly higher than that for peach trees (Goldhamer et al.”
Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. (2006, methodology): “Alternative methods to using SWP that can be automated, such as the use of dendrometry (Goldhamer and Fereres, 2001), have relatively high variability (Intrigliolo and Castel, 2004; Naor et al., 2006) and, thus, require additional research to reduce uncertainty in their use before they can be…”