Recreation-amenity use and contingent valuation of urban greenspaces in Guangzhou, China

441 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Protest response and willingness to pay for culturally significant urban trees: Implications for Contingent Valuation Method (2015, background): “It is particularly useful for assessing the existence values that people assign to natural elements in cities, including urban trees and green spaces (Bernath and Roschewitz, 2008; Brander and Koetse, 2011; Jim and Chen, 2006; Lo and Jim, 2010; Majumdar et al., 2011; Tyrväinen and Väänänen, 1998; Ve”
Factors associated with soundscape experiences in urban green spaces: A case study in Rostock, Germany (2017, background): “, 2004; Jim and Chen, 2008), preserving biodiversity (Mörtberg and Wallentinus, 2000), providing spaces with high restorative and aesthetic values (De Vries et al., 2003; Hillsdon et al., 2006; Jiang et al., 2015; Jim and Chen, 2006).”
Ecosystem services and valuation of urban forests in China (2009, background): “Urban forests could generate significant ecosystem services, such as offsetting carbon emission (Jo, 2002), removing air pollutants, reducing noise, regulating the microclimate (Bolund and Hunhammar, 1999), recreation and amenity (Jim and Chen, 2006a).”