Evaluation of docking calculations on X-ray structures using CONSENSUS-DOCK.

By M. Okamoto, Y. Masuda, A. Muroya, Kazuhiro Yasuno, O. Takahashi, T. Furuya. 2010

6 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Computational Chemistry & Drug Discovery

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

1. Glaucius Oliva
2. L. Ferreira
3. Ricardo N Dos Santos
4. Elizabeth Yuriev
5. Adriano Defini Andricopulo
6. Paul A. Ramsland
7. Luca Pinzi
8. Giulio Rastelli

In Materials Chemistry

1. Elizabeth Yuriev
2. Glaucius Oliva
3. Adriano Defini Andricopulo
4. Paul A. Ramsland
5. L. Ferreira
6. Ricardo N Dos Santos

In Molecular Biology

1. Glaucius Oliva
2. L. Ferreira
3. Ricardo N Dos Santos
4. Elizabeth Yuriev
5. Adriano Defini Andricopulo
6. Paul A. Ramsland

In Computational Chemistry & Drug Discovery

1. Elizabeth Yuriev
2. Glaucius Oliva
3. Adriano Defini Andricopulo
4. Paul A. Ramsland
5. L. Ferreira
6. Ricardo N Dos Santos
7. Giulio Rastelli
8. Luca Pinzi

Citations in the corpus

• Molecular Docking and Structure-Based Drug Design Strategies (2015, background): “Examples of consensus scoring functions are MultiScore, X-Cscore, GFscore, SCS, SeleX-CS and CONSENSUS-DOCK [65–70].”
• Latest developments in molecular docking: 2010–2011 in review (2013, methodology): “…– binding af fi nity relationship (knowledge based) and MedusaScore (force fi eld based); [91] a combination of MCSS and GOLD docking with MM/GBSA rescoring for fragments; [32] a combination of AutoDock4 and AutoDock Vina; [92] a combination of DOCK4, [93] FlexX, and PMF; [94] and HarmonyDOCK.”