The Confusions of Fitness

By André Ariew, R. Lewontin. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2004

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Genetics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b1866fb19780b0ac44032da57c9ce833d6bedbe

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

1. Charles H. Pence
2. Grant Ramsey

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Charles H. Pence
2. Grant Ramsey

Citations in the corpus

• A New Foundation for the Propensity Interpretation of Fitness (2013, background): “Furthermore, many counterexamples have been raised against propensity-based models of trait fitness, including critiques by Ariew and Lewontin ([2004]),(19) and Krimbas ([2004]).(20) One might be concerned, then, both that our model fails to respond adequately to these other counterexamples present ”