Modularity in development and evolution.

By G. Schlosser, D. Thieffry. Bioessays, 2000

596 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Management of Technology and Innovation, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b159bc21a5ef75f219663d0441fac3e4af81ddb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Control and Systems Engineering

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Mechanical Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Representation in the genome and in other inheritance systems (2007, background): “However, the scale of interdependence in development remains a matter of experimental investigation (Schlosser and Wagner 2004).”
Characterization of complex networks: A survey of measurements (2005, methodology): “ty has been used in many community-ﬁnding algorithms, as brieﬂy reviewed in the following. Though there are many ways to deﬁned modularity, a generally accepted deﬁ- nition of a module does not exist [125]. The deﬁnitions descr ibed above estimate the modularity in terms of a given partitioning. Ziv”
Multilevel Compression of Random Walks on Networks Reveals Hierarchical Organization in Large Integrated Systems (2010, background): “For example, both biological and social systems are often characterized by hierarchical organization with submodules in modules over multiple scales [6–10].”
Biological Physics of the Developing Embryo (2005, unknown): “, the capacity of a complex whole to be decomposed into independently operable, but interacting, structural or functional units (‘‘modules”) (von Dassow and Munro, 1999; Winther, 2001; Schlosser and Wagner, 2004).”
The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents (2005, background): “…tedious terminological arguments, I might have been tempted to avoid the term ‘‘module’’ altogether if it were not that that there is much recent relevant work on biological modularity (e.g., Schlosser & Wagner, 2004), of which cognitive modularity is best seen, I want to argue, as a special case.”
Modularity in cognition: framing the debate. (2006, background): “…in the evolutionary developmental biology literature, an aspect of the phenotype is developmentally modular to the degree that natural selection can act on it independent of other aspects of the phenotype (e.g., Griffiths, in press; Riedl, 1978; Schlosser & Wagner, 2004; Wagner & Altenberg, 1996).”