Physiological and structural tradeoffs underlying the leaf economics spectrum.
By Y. Onoda, I. Wright, John R. Evans, K. Hikosaka, K. Kitajima, U. Niinemets, Hendrik Poorter, T. Tosens, M. Westoby. New Phytologist, 2017
610 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b139010a816c2c45d6f107c05a36afdb9585afc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Traits link drought resistance with herbivore defence and plant economics in semi‐arid grasslands: The central roles of phenology and leaf dry matter content (2020, background): “LDMC is often related to leaf N, because greater relative investment in cell walls requires lower relative investment in photosynthesis (Niinemets, 2001; Onoda et al., 2017).”
- Climate and soil nutrients differentially drive multidimensional fine root traits in ectomycorrhizal‐dominated alpine coniferous forests (2020, background): “…usually select for a conservative strategy by increasing the cell wall fraction and hence higher RTD for longer duration of resource foraging (Eissenstat & Achor, 1999; Wahl & Ryser, 2000), which is also widely observed in leaves (Onoda et al., 2017; Shipley, Lechowicz, Wright, & Reich, 2006).”