Temporal stability of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder criteria in a problem-drinking sample.
By T. Keane, Amy Rubin, Mark Lachowicz, D. Brief, Justin L. Enggasser, M. Roy, J. Hermos, Eric D Helmuth, D. Rosenbloom. 2014
73 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Brian Marx
- P. Schnurr
- E. Foa
- T. Keane
- Denise Sloan
- Brittany N. Hall-Clark
- F. Weathers
- Alexander H. Jordan
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Psychometric analysis of the PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5) among treatment-seeking military service members. (2016, background): “A study of war veterans enrolled in an online intervention reported adequate fit and temporal stability of the DSM-5 structure (Keane et al., 2014).”
- The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM–5 (CAPS-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation in Military Veterans (2017, background): “PCL-5 scores have excellent psychometric properties, including strong internal consistency, test–retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, structural validity, diagnostic utility, and sensitivity to clinical change (Blevins, Weathers, Davis, Witte, & Domino, 2015; Bovin et al., 2016;”
- The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation. (2015, result): “Of note in this regard, Keane et al. (2014) provided evidence of temporal sta- bility of the PCL-5 factor structure in a treatment study with veterans, demonstrating that even though PCL-5 scores dropped over time, the PCL-5 continued to measure the same underlying construct.”
- Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition (PCL-5) in veterans. (2016, unknown): “…PCL-5 was completed in 2013, several studies have reported on its psychometric characteristics in veteran (Armour et al., 2015; Brief et al., 2013; Keane et al., 2014; Tsai et al., 2015), active duty (Hoge, Riviere, Wilk, Herrell, & Weathers, 2014), and community (Armour et al., 2015; Biehn et…”