Are “Decoupled” Farm Program Payments Really Decoupled? An Empirical Evaluation

252 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Technical efficiency and productivity differentials of dairy farms in three EU countries: the role of CAP subsidies (2012, background): “3 There is also a sizable literature reporting effects of subsidies on farm growth and exit (Pietola et al., 2003; Ahearn et al., 2005; Goodwin and Mishra, 2006; Ooms, 2007).”
How Coupled Are Decoupled Farm Payments? A Review of the Evidence (2009, unknown): “Goodwin and Mishra (2006), earlier discussed in sections 3 and 4, also investigate the impact of PFC payments on the allocation of land across alternate practices such as conservation reserves, pasture, fallow and other idling practices.”
Global Agricultural Trade and Developing Countries (2004, background): “Goodwin and Mishra (2002) argue that a fully decoupled payment must be fixed and guaranteed and thus is not influenced by ex post realizations of market conditions (such as low prices or area yields).”
Credit Constraints: Their Existence, Determinants, and Implications for U.S. Farm and Nonfarm Sole Proprietorships (2009, background): “By segmenting the farm data into crop and livestock producers, we add empirical evidence to the ongoing debate concerning agricultural subsidies, in particular to the question of decoupled payments and their impact on production decisions (Goodwin and Mishra 2006).”