What determines the reconnection rate at the dayside magnetosphere
By J. Borovsky, M. Hesse, Juhani Birn, M. Kuznetsova. 2008
149 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atmospheric Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ac328487444164416e85d4d96f0d020f5e91fbd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
In Atmospheric Science
Citations in the corpus
- Circulation of Heavy Ions and Their Dynamical Effects in the Magnetosphere: Recent Observations and Models (2014, result): “A similar result was found in roundabout fashion in an earlier, single-fluid MHD investigation of reconnection rates (Borovsky et al. 2008).”
- Substorm and magnetosphere characteristic scales inferred from the SuperMAG auroral electrojet indices (2011, background): “Figure 9 shows the distribution of several possible driving functions (based on 10 min averages), including Bz, EKL, dFMP/dt, and the Borovsky function [Borovsky et al., 2008].”
- Altered solar wind-magnetosphere interaction at low Mach numbers: Coronal mass ejections (2008, methodology): “Twodimensional [Borovsky and Hesse, 2007; Birn et al., 2007] and three-dimensional [Borovsky et al., 2008a] MHD simulations were performed to determine the parameters that control such asymmetric magnetic reconnection.”
- A statistical look at plasmaspheric drainage plumes (2008, background): “…is where does the plasmaspheric-plume plasma go after the flux tubes are opened by dayside reconnection [Freeman et al., 1977; Elphic et al., 1997; Su et al., 2001b] and does this drained plasma impact the mechanics of the magnetosphere [Borovsky et al., 2008; Borovsky and Steinberg, 2006].”