A Survey of Lightweight-Cryptography Implementations

515 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Advanced lightweight encryption algorithms for IoT devices: survey, challenges and solutions (2017, unknown): “Thus, it is applied to the small area of hardware implementation, which leads to faster computation in real time (Eisenbarth and Kumar 2007).”
The Internet of Things vision: Key features, applications and open issues (2014, background): “Conversely, lightweight cryptography (LWC) algorithms seem the most promising for this environment [238] as they are mainly tailored to constrained devices by introducing trade-offs between security levels, cost, and performance.”
IoT Elements, Layered Architectures and Security Issues: A Comprehensive Survey (2018, methodology): “Lightweight cryptography is a mechanism that is used to meet the security requirements in smart devices [92].”
SIMON and SPECK: Block Ciphers for the Internet of Things (2015, unknown): “2 We note that there is a faster bit-sliced implementation of PRESENT [45], which encrypts at 370.875 cycles per byte, plus about 40 cycles per byte for data transposition operations.”
Lightweight Cryptography Algorithms for Resource-Constrained IoT Devices: A Review, Comparison and Research Opportunities (2021, methodology): “The reduced number of S-box (eight to only one [82]) and multiplexer [83] used in DESL distinguishes it from DES.”