Relationships between Convective Storm Kinematics, Precipitation, and Lightning

By T. Lang, S. Rutledge. 2002

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Numerically Simulated Electrification and Lightning of the 29 June 2000 STEPS Supercell Storm (2006, background): “Lang and Rutledge (2002) suggested that one of the factors leading to predominately (cid:1) CG flashes in several midlatitude storms (one of which is 29 June) was an unusually large updraft volume.”
Predicting the potential for lightning activity in Mediterranean storms based on the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model dynamic and microphysical fields (2010, unknown): “…of such relationships probably reflects the geographical differences in thun-derstorm characteristics, as apparent from the works in the United States by Tapia et al. [1998], Land and Rutledge [2002], and Latham et al. [2003]; in France by Soula et al. [1998]; and in China by Zhou et al. [2002].”
The global lightning-induced nitrogen oxides source (2007, background): “The flash properties vary from storm to storm and during the lifecycle of a thunderstorm; moreover, they depend on the volume and strength of the convective updrafts causing charge separation (Lang and Rutledge, 2002).”
The 29 June 2000 Supercell Observed during STEPS. Part II: Lightning and Charge Structure (2005, unknown): “The results of Lang and Rutledge (2002) offer further support.”