Flow in unsaturated fractured porous media: Hydraulic conductivity of rough surfaces

By Dani Or, Markus Tuller. 2000

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Geophysics, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2aa5ce6ca145b60e78cb6690fc8e237466884ab8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

1. Andre Peters
2. Behzad Ghanbarian
3. Marc Lebeau
4. J. Konrad
5. Allen G. Hunt
6. Hugh Daigle
7. Dani Or
8. Markus Tuller

In Geophysics

1. Andre Peters
2. Marc Lebeau
3. J. Konrad
4. Allen G. Hunt
5. Dani Or
6. Markus Tuller
7. Behzad Ghanbarian
8. J. Nimmo

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Andre Peters
2. Dani Or
3. Markus Tuller
4. Allen G. Hunt
5. Hugh Daigle
6. Behzad Ghanbarian

Citations in the corpus

• A new capillary and thin film flow model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media (2010, background): “For flow in these films, Or and Tuller [2000] introduced an exponential viscosity function into the Navier‐Stokes equations and found the following expression for volumetric flow rate per unit length of film:”
• Hydraulic conductivity of variably saturated porous media: Film and corner flow in angular pore space (2001, methodology): “We use three soils with measured retention and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity data reported by Pachepsky et al. [1984], and seven datasets listed in the soil catalogue of Mualem [1976a], to evaluate the proposed model (Tab.”
• Water films and scaling of soil characteristic curves at low water contents (2005, unknown): “For practical purposes we can select a cutoff potential around 10 MPa for which capillary condensation due to surface roughness becomes negligible [Or and Tuller, 2000].”
• Plant Growth‐Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) Reduce Evaporation and Increase Soil Water Retention (2017, background): “Lastly and more importantly, it has been shown that surface roughness increases water film thickness (Kibbey, 2013; Or & Tuller, 2000; Zheng et al., 2015).”
• Fluid flow in porous media with rough pore‐solid interface (2016, background): “Another plausible possibility for relative permeability underestimation might be neglecting corner and film flow [see e.g., Or and Tuller, 2000; Tuller and Or, 2001, 2002], which may dominate capillary flow, particularly at low water saturations.”
• Simple consistent models for water retention and hydraulic conductivity in the complete moisture range (2013, background): “Since the dynamic viscosity of the fluid will increase at very high suctions [Or and Tuller, 2000] and the dominant forces acting on the water molecules switch from ionic electrostatic to molecular forces, the slope will slightly change as suction increases and thus thickness decreases [Lebeau and K”