Approaches to end-to-end ecosystem models
By Elizabeth A. Fulton. 2010
396 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2aa4c5596feaa88bbbe7cee8a4ed498fe5e64933
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Environmental Engineering
- J. Pinnegar
- Miranda C. Jones
- Stefan Gößling-Reisemann
- Wwl Cheung
- Elizabeth A. Fulton
- R. Watson
- B. Crona
- F. Mark
In Global and Planetary Change
- Wwl Cheung
- Elizabeth A. Fulton
- R. Watson
- Aditee Mitra
- M. Peck
- T. McClanahan
- J. Pinnegar
- Miranda C. Jones
Citations in the corpus
- Multispecies fisheries management and conservation: tactical applications using models of intermediate complexity (2014, background): “By comparison, end-to-end modelling allows for a much wider range of response variables, functional groups, et cetera to be investigated (Rose et al. 2010; Fulton 2010).”
- Modelling climate change impacts on marine fish populations: process-based integration of ocean warming, acidification and other environmental drivers (2016, background): “Fish stocks are age-structured, with average size 646 and condition tracked, and different types of functional responses can be used to describe 647 trophic interactions (Fulton, 2010, Kaplan et al., 2012).”
- Effects of climate‐driven primary production change on marine food webs: implications for fisheries and conservation (2010, methodology): “The EwE software has been under development since the 1980s (Christensen & Walters, 2004a) and there are 200 models developed worldwide (Fulton, 2009).”
- Elasticity in ecosystem services: exploring the variable relationship between ecosystems and human well-being (2016, background): “Modeling, particularly recent innovation and development of “end-to-end” models (Fulton 2010), may provide an opportunity to synthesize diverse types of information (from biophysical to social), to explore how patterns of elasticity emerge and can be modified.”
- Interesting times: winners, losers, and system shifts under climate change around Australia (2011, background): “These mechanistic models attempt to integrate abiotic, biotic, and anthropogenic processes across different scales, allowing for dynamic two-way coupling (or interactions) between ecosystem components from microbes to top predators and the human sectors that exploit the system (Travers et al., 2007;”
- Projecting changes in the distribution and productivity of living marine resources: A critical review of the suite of modelling approaches used in the large European project VECTORS (2016, methodology): “ATLANTIS has been applied in many regions to consider fisheries, conservation, and multiple use management of marine and coastal resources (Fulton et al., 2011 and Morzari-Luna et al., 2012) including the exploration of potential impacts of climate change on natural resources and ecosystems (Fulton,”
- Bridging the gap between marine biogeochemical and fisheries sciences; configuring the zooplankton link (2014, background): “While some models include additional features such as temperature or movement (Blackford et al., 2004; Plagányi, 2007; Fulton, 2010), the main description of the core Z-vital rates accord with that of Fasham (1993).”