An in Vivo Map of the Yeast Protein Interactome
By K. Tarassov, Vincent Messier, Christian R. Landry, S. Radinovic, M. M. Molina, I. Shames, Yelena Malitskaya, J. Vogel, H. Bussey, Stephen W. Michnick. Science, 2008
798 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2a7a8dec679edc8d80e4cf13ad195078bd9a087c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Molecular Biology
- Trey Ideker
- Anastasia Baryshnikova
- Haiyuan Yu
- Nevan J. Krogan
- Anne-Ruxandra Carvunis
- Marc Vidal
- Michael E. Cusick
- David E. Hill
Citations in the corpus
- Differential network biology (2012, background): “For instance, the systematic identification of pairwise protein interactions (Stelzl et al , 2005; Tarassov et al , 2008; Yu et al , 2008; Consortium, 2011) or protein complexes (Butland et al , 2005; Gavin et al , 2006; Krogan et al , 2006; Sowa et al , 2009) has been a widely used strategy for…”
- Computational approaches for detecting protein complexes from protein interaction networks: a survey (2010, methodology): “However, there are several limitations to this method [10].”
- Structure-based prediction of protein-protein interactions on a genome-wide scale (2012, methodology): “Y e as t Uetz 1437 Y2H IntAct [36] Ito 4447 Y2H IntAct [37] Yu 1626 Y2H IntAct [26] Ho 3614 AP/MS IntAct [38] Gavin02 3756 AP/MS IntAct [39] Krogan 8183 AP/MS MINT [40] Gavin06 21242 AP/MS IntAct [41] Tarassov 9601 PCA IntAct [42]”
- Global Functional Atlas of Escherichia coli Encompassing Previously Uncharacterized Proteins (2009, methodology): “Hence, alternative proteomic methods, such as two-hybrid screens [13,84–86] or in vivo protein-fragment complementation assays [87], may be better suited for detecting certain PI currently underrepresented in our dataset.”
- Up-to-date catalogues of yeast protein complexes (2008, methodology): “Only 47% of the CYC2008 complexes have some support from direct binary interaction data, whereas the vast majority (94%) of the binary interactions fall outside of known complexes, as noted by others as well (3,14).”
- Literature-curated protein interaction datasets (2009, background): “, but none can yet be routinely scaled up for high-throughput assays, although recently, a protein complementation assay allowed a large-scale mapping of the yeast interactom”
- Systematic Functional Annotation and Visualization of Biological Networks (2016, background): “…availability of extensive molecular interaction networks that map physical, biochemical and phenotypic relationships between nearly all genes in the genome (Gavin et al., 2006; Krogan et al., 2006; Zhu et al., 2007; Tarassov et al., 2008; Yu et al., 2008; Mo et al., 2009; Costanzo et al., 2010).”