Homogeneous vs heterogeneous clustered sensor networks: a comparative study

By Vivek P. Mhatre, Catherine P. Rosenberg. IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2004

459 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2a762c9d0d12c873f16306b2077ca56f142e61af

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Antonio Alfredo Ferreira Loureiro
2. Eduardo Freire Nakamura
3. M. M. Afsar
4. Mohammad-H. Tayarani-N.
5. Alejandro Cesar Orgambide Frery
6. Fengjun Shang

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. M. M. Afsar
2. Mohammad-H. Tayarani-N.
3. Alejandro Cesar Orgambide Frery
4. Antonio Alfredo Ferreira Loureiro
5. Fengjun Shang
6. Eduardo Freire Nakamura

Citations in the corpus

• An Energy-Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks (2011, background): “M-LEACH [17] aims at multi-hop sensor network and the complexity of algorithm is great.”
• Information fusion for wireless sensor networks: Methods, models, and classifications (2007, methodology): “The .rst hierarchical solution for WSNs was the LEACH [Heinzelman et al. 2000], but sev­eral others have been proposed since then [Halgamuge et al. 2003; Kochhal et al. 2003; Mhatre and Rosenberg 2004; Hoang and Motani 2005a; Gupta et al. 2005].”
• Clustering in sensor networks: A literature survey (2014, background): “The authors show that M-LEACH has a better performance than LEACH.”