Explanation and Argumentation Capabilities:Towards the Creation of More Persuasive Agents
By Bernard Moulin, Hengameh Irandoust, Micheline Bélanger, G. Desbordes. 2002
129 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Management Information Systems
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Management Information Systems
Citations in the corpus
- Explanation in Human-AI Systems: A Literature Meta-Review, Synopsis of Key Ideas and Publications, and Bibliography for Explainable AI (2019, neutral): “…Core, Van Lent, Solomon, and Gomboc, 2005; Langley, Meadows, Sridharan, and Choi, 2017; Lomas et al., 2012; Metoyer et al., 2010; Mnih et al., 2015; Moulin et al., 2002; Rosenthal, Selvaraj, and Veloso, 2016; S. Singh, Lewis, Barto, and Sorg, 2010; Stubbs, Hinds, and Wettergreen, 2007; Van Lent,…”
- A dialogue system specification for explanation (2011, background): “There is a growing literature on helping us to better understand the special notion of understanding in the natural sciences (Friedman 1974; Trout 2002; Moulin et al. 2002).”
- A new dialectical theory of explanation (2004, methodology): “This sequence of reasoning is called a trace explanation (Moulin et al. 2002, 174–76).”
- Formalizing Explanatory Dialogues (2015, background): “We give a general account of dialectical shifts in ECE and as an example we describe a shift to argumentative dialogue to facilitate arguing over explanations (as argued for in [16]).”
- A systematic review and taxonomy of explanations in decision support and recommender systems (2017, background): “2 There is a large number of surveys that provide an overview of explanations published elsewhere (Tintarev and Masthoff 2007b, 2011; Swartout and Moore 1993; Chandrasekaran et al. 1989; Dhaliwal and Benbasat 1996; Gregor and Benbasat 1999; Moulin et al. 2002; Lacave and Díez 2002, 2004; Sørmo et al”