Publicly Available Clinical BERT Embeddings

By Emily Alsentzer, John R. Murphy, Willie Boag, Wei-Hung Weng, Di Jin, Tristan Naumann, Matthew B. A. McDermott. 2019

2,728 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Contextual word embedding models such as ELMo and BERT have dramatically improved performance for many natural language processing (NLP) tasks in recent months. However, these models have been minimally explored on specialty corpora, such as clinical text; moreover, in the clinical domain, no publicly-available pre-trained BERT models yet exist. In this work, we address this need by exploring and releasing BERT models for clinical text: one for generic clinical text and another for discharge summaries specifically. We demonstrate that using a domain-specific model yields performance improvements on 3/5 clinical NLP tasks, establishing a new state-of-the-art on the MedNLI dataset. We find that these domain-specific models are not as performant on 2 clinical de-identification tasks, and argue that this is a natural consequence of the differences between de-identified source text and synthetically non de-identified task text.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Representation & Self-Supervised Learning

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Percy Liang
  2. Mohit Bansal
  3. Noah A. Smith
  4. Graham Neubig
  5. Yejin Choi
  6. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  7. Jianfeng Gao
  8. Erik Cambria

In Natural Language Processing

  1. Mohit Bansal
  2. Percy Liang
  3. Noah A. Smith
  4. Graham Neubig
  5. Yejin Choi
  6. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  7. Yoav Goldberg
  8. Yonatan Belinkov

In Representation & Self-Supervised Learning

  1. Percy Liang
  2. Yoshua Bengio
  3. Noah A. Smith
  4. Yoav Goldberg
  5. Ruslan Salakhutdinov
  6. Christopher D. Manning
  7. Xipeng Qiu
  8. Erik Cambria

Citations in the corpus