Calibration, identifiability and optimal experimental design of activated sludge models

By B. Petersen. 2000

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Activated sludge wastewater treatment plant modelling and simulation: state of the art (2004, methodology): “The methodology is illustrated in detail by Petersen et al. (2002). This paper will provide the reader with a number of key references as guidance through some of the abovementioned steps.”
Characterising performance of environmental models (2013, methodology): “The relationship between identifiability and sensitivity through the Fisher Information Matrix (FIM) was explored in depth by Petersen (2000) and De Pauw (2005), and later applied to riverquality models by Marsili-Libelli and Giusti (2008).”
Confidence regions of estimated parameters for ecological systems (2003, methodology): “(6) is also the inverse of the FIM, defined as FIM =∑N i=1(∂yi/∂p)TV −2 i (∂yi/∂p), in terms of output sensitivities (8), i.e. CJ (p̂) = FIM−1 (Munak, 1999; Petersen, 2000; Dochain and Vanrolleghem, 2001).”