From Catch-all Politics to Cartelisation: The Political Economy of the Cartel Party
225 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2a324b0201ec39b3f9420c5bc5621822f490d054
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Political Science and International Relations
Citations in the corpus
- Partisan Politics: The Empirical Evidence from OECD Panel Studies (2017, unknown): “…agree to not reject the “cartel-partyhypothesis” describing that political parties had formed a cartel, “employing the resources of the state to limit political competition and ensure their own electoral success” (Katz and Mair 2009: 753; see Katz and Mair 1995 and 2009 and Blyth and Katz 2005).”
- Does government ideology influence deregulation of product markets? Empirical evidence from OECD countries (2010, unknown): “Rightwing parties prefer protection of property rights, rule of law and legal quality more than leftwing parties because they desire to protect merit and the gains from talent (B jSZlrnskov 2005a, 2005b). State intervention is justified in this context only if it attacks or restricts obstacles to ef”
- Did globalization restrict partisan politics? An empirical evaluation of social expenditures in a panel of OECD countries (2009, background): “This literature, in particular, dismisses the move of ideologically leftwing and rightwing parties towards “catch-all” parties (e.g. Katz and Mair 1995; Blyth and Katz 2005).”