Mismeasuring biological diversity: : Response to Hoffmann and Hoffmann (2008)
By L. Jost. 2009
96 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2a28564d96a60b25fba26cc711e2c3db404deb9e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Measuring diversity: the importance of species similarity. (2012, methodology): “Jost (2006, 2007, 2009) has argued eloquently for the primacy of effective numbers.”
- Partitioning diversity for conservation analyses (2010, methodology): “First, its fundamental premise, that diversity can be equated with complexity measures such as Shannon entropy and the Gini–Simpson index (heterozygosity), leads to logical contradictions in conservation analyses (Jost, 2009).”
- Comparing measures of species diversity from incomplete inventories: an update (2010, background): “This encourages, in combination with other preferential properties (e.g. Jost 2006, 2007, 2009), the use of this measure in biodiversity studies.”
- The Relation between Evenness and Diversity (2010, background): “I have argued elsewhere [6,11-14] that the concept of diversity, especially in conservation applications, should be quantified by measures of compositional complexity that obey the “replication principle”.”
- Does pollen-assemblage richness reflect floristic richness? A review of recent developments and future challenges (2016, unknown): “…et al., 2011), and in the increasing adoption and use of Hill’s (1973) unified notation of 83 diversity indices and related evenness measures (e.g. Jost, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010a, 2014; Hoffman 84 and Hoffman, 2008; Chao et al., 2010, 2012, 2014a, 2014b; Colwell, 2010; Ellison, 2010; Jost et…”
- Unifying Species Diversity, Phylogenetic Diversity, Functional Diversity, and Related Similarity and Differentiation Measures Through Hill Numbers (2014, background): “The property has been extensively discussed by many authors (MacArthur 1965, 1972;Whittaker 1972;Hill 1973; Peet 1974; Routledge 1979; Jost 2006, 2007, 2009; Ricotta & Szeidl 2009; Jost et al. 2010) and has been extended to phylogenetic and functional diversity measures (Chao et al. 2010, Chiu &…”