A practical guide to understanding reliability in studies of within-person variability

293 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Living well by “flowing’ well: The indirect effect of autotelic personality on well-being through flow experience (2020, background): “Regarding the interpretations of the reliability coefficients, Nezlek (2017) has noted that the within-level reliability is often lower than the betweenlevel reliability and has advocated for ‘more relaxed standards [on reliability] than one might apply for trait measures’ (p. 154).”
Private self-consciousness in daily life: Relationships between rumination and reflection and well-being, and meaning in daily life (2017, methodology): “According to Park (2010), to feel that one's life hasmeaning (presence), requires that some type of meaning making process has occurred. Such meaning making processes are probably in progress (or halted) as people ruminate which means that people are less likely to find meaning in life when they are”
Assessing Personality States: What to Consider when Constructing Personality State Measures (2020, background): “For each ‘study’, one can then estimate the reliability and finally aggregate all reliability estimates (Nezlek, 2017; O’Brien, 1990).”
Confirmation Bias and the Persistence of Misinformation on Climate Change (2021, methodology): “For message-specific, repeated measures scales, multilevel alpha reliabilities were assessed following the procedures in Nezlek (2016).”